Dystopia
http://forums.sordidystopia.com/

Discussion time.
http://forums.sordidystopia.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=642
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Zombzeh Nayt-o! [ Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Discussion time.

All right, boys and girls. It's time to bring to bring a discussion to this very WOODED table. This must be a long discussion. This I insist. Also, you are obligated to quote the post above you each time you post--and only the post above you.

Starting it off: what makes an Alex?

Author:  Zombzeh Nayt-o! [ Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Discussion time.

Alex wrote:
Zombzeh Nayt-o! wrote:
All right, boys and girls. It's time to bring to bring a discussion to this very WOODED table. This must be a long discussion. This I insist. Also, you are obligated to quote the post above you each time you post--and only the post above you.

Starting it off: what makes an Alex?


I hear behind every Alex is an even better Justin.


But without an Alex there can be no Justin. Does that mean, then, that an Alex makes a Justin? Or is a Justin simply a necessary component of an Alex?

Author:  Zombzeh Nayt-o! [ Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Discussion time.

Alex wrote:
Zombzeh Nayt-o! wrote:
Alex wrote:
Zombzeh Nayt-o! wrote:
All right, boys and girls. It's time to bring to bring a discussion to this very WOODED table. This must be a long discussion. This I insist. Also, you are obligated to quote the post above you each time you post--and only the post above you.

Starting it off: what makes an Alex?


I hear behind every Alex is an even better Justin.


But without an Alex there can be no Justin. Does that mean, then, that an Alex makes a Justin? Or is a Justin simply a necessary component of an Alex?


Interesting question, Nate. I believe that they are merely two sides of the same coin, without one, there cannot be the other, and to that extent, one is definitely necessary for the other, but that doesn't mean either should exist. Indeed, a world without either may very well be better.


Perhaps. And since one cannot exist without the other--all we'd have to do is destroy one of them.

Which would be easiest to destroy, though?

Author:  Skylar [ Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Discussion time.

Zombzeh Nayt-o! wrote:
Alex wrote:
Zombzeh Nayt-o! wrote:
Alex wrote:
Zombzeh Nayt-o! wrote:
All right, boys and girls. It's time to bring to bring a discussion to this very WOODED table. This must be a long discussion. This I insist. Also, you are obligated to quote the post above you each time you post--and only the post above you.

Starting it off: what makes an Alex?


I hear behind every Alex is an even better Justin.


But without an Alex there can be no Justin. Does that mean, then, that an Alex makes a Justin? Or is a Justin simply a necessary component of an Alex?


Interesting question, Nate. I believe that they are merely two sides of the same coin, without one, there cannot be the other, and to that extent, one is definitely necessary for the other, but that doesn't mean either should exist. Indeed, a world without either may very well be better.


Perhaps. And since one cannot exist without the other--all we'd have to do is destroy one of them.

Which would be easiest to destroy, though?



Who!!??

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/